(Actually, I got back late Sunday evening. My father had appointments on Monday that he almost forgot about.)

So anyway, I get my news straight from the internet via RSS feeds to several websites. I get my national news from the News Straits Times’ local feed.

The reason I do this is that every time I read something that annoys me in a newspaper, I get a definite visceral reaction knowing that it was paid for. Really, I’m not kidding – I get an irritating itch at the back of my neck that only goes away once I forcible push the thought of whatever-it-was-that-annoyed-me out of my mind.

One day, I told myself, “No more! If I’m going to allow masochist-salian to indulge in the sad state of the news, it is at least going to be for free.”

[Enter RSS feeds]

Yesterday, I saw something that pretty much validates my original idea to not pay to be irritated.

Notice how “little boys” get a role model, while “young girls” get doe-eyes?

Alright, so the writer of said summary did say “from X to Y”, which could also imply that little girls get a role model too and that certain young boys can get all gooey over Dr. Such-A-Long-Name.

Is it too much to ask that instead of “little boys”, they write “little children”? (I’d ask if it is too much to ask the “young girls” be changed to “young people” too, but I have a feeling that it is too much for a national newspaper.)

Or maybe some bill been passed making it illegal for young girls to seek out futures in astronomy?

The article itself was alright, it’s just this summary that I had a bone to pick with.

-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-

Intan